Introduction
In the world of healthcare, the significance of continuing education (CE) is undeniable. It acts as the guiding light in a healthcare professional's pursuit of excellence and ensures they stay on the path of medical knowledge and practice.¹The core of impactful CE is built on seven pillars. Each pillar plays an important role in the comprehensive growth of clinicians.² This article explores these pillars and uncovers how they shape the CE landscape and foster lifelong learning in the medical field.
Pillar No. 1: The Power of Evidence-based Learning
At the very core of CE lies evidence-based medicine. Evidence-based medicine is a methodical approach to resolving clinical issues by blending proven research evidence with clinical knowledge and patient preferences.³ In this type of learning, science isn't just about regurgitating theory. Instead, scientific research encourages critical thinking and fosters continuous improvement⁴ ⁵ ⁶ ⁷Also, evidence-based learning empowers healthcare professionals to understand the rationale behind each decision and reinforce the decision with practices that have been proven through rigorous scrutiny. Essentially, this pillar embraces a mindset that doesn't just accept the status quo but pushes the boundaries of what's possible.⁸ ⁹ ¹⁰ By anchoring education in evidence, CE programs cultivate a culture of critical thinking and informed decision-making among clinicians.¹¹
Pillar No. 2: The Journey of Competency Development
CE is a competency-based arena where the specific skills and knowledge that healthcare professionals need to deliver exceptional care are the cornerstone.¹² CE is not just mere accreditation requirements, but yet, it is a space where healthcare professionals hone their skills and expand their knowledge. Thoughtfully crafted programs serve as a bridge between theory and practice and raise the bar of care provided to patients. This pillar fuels the ongoing growth of healthcare professionals and ensures they are adept in both current practices and emerging breakthroughs in medicine.¹³
Pillar No. 3: The Heart of Patient-centered Care
The principle of patient-centered care is increasingly becoming embedded in the DNA of CE. The National Academy of Medicine (formerly known as the Institute of Medicine) defined patient-centered care as: “Providing care that is respectful of, and responsive to, individual patient preferences, needs and values, and ensuring that patient values guide all clinical decisions.”¹⁴ Essentially, patient-centered care education is education that champions the patient needs and outcomes. This strategy cultivates a healthcare environment where treatment plans are co-designed by the individual. This self-design advocacy can lend itself to improved patient satisfaction and healthcare results. CE programs that champion patient-centered care inspire professionals to perceive patients as partners in their healthcare journey.¹⁵ ¹⁶
Pillar No. 4: The Power of Interprofessional Collaboration
Healthcare is a team sport that calls for synergy among professionals from various fields. Interprofessional education in CE encourages collaboration and underscores the importance of teamwork in delivering comprehensive care. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines interprofessional education as, “when students from two or more professions learn about, from and with each other to enable effective collaboration and improve health outcomes”.¹⁷ Through shared learning experiences, healthcare professionals learn to harness their collective expertise for better patient outcomes.
Pillar No. 5: The Integration of Technology
Technology has and continues to revolutionize the delivery of medical education. The offerings of tools and resources have enhanced the delivery of learning experiences. In fact, healthcare professionals are increasingly accessing their education through digital platforms.¹⁸ From artificial intelligence (AI) to virtual learning environments, technological integration is a key pillar of CE. These advancements offer healthcare professionals flexible, interactive learning experiences that can be customized to individual learning styles and boost the accessibility of medical education. Yet, effective integration of technology in CE requires more than just adopting new gadgets or flashy platforms. It requires the strategic alignment of adult learning principles with the consultation of experts in innovative content and learning methodologies. By leveraging technology purposefully, CME programs can enhance learning outcomes that facilitate meaningful knowledge acquisition for healthcare professionals.2
Pillar No. 6: Learners First
At the heart of CE lies the fundamental principle of putting learners first, a concept rooted in the principles of adult learning theory, or andragogy. Malcolm Knowles, often regarded as the "Father of Andragogy," made significant contributions to the field by emphasizing the unique characteristics of adult learners, such as their self-directedness, accumulated life experiences and readiness to learn.¹⁹ By recognizing these traits, CME programs can tailor educational experiences to meet the needs and preferences of adult learners. Moreover, applying adult learning principles in CME promotes a learner-centered approach that empowers healthcare professionals to take ownership of their learning journey and apply newfound knowledge directly to their practice.²⁰ ²¹ As CME evolves, there is a growing recognition of the need to transition from andragogy to heutagogy, a pedagogical approach that emphasizes self-directed learning and continuous personal development.²² ²³ This shift underscores the importance of equipping healthcare professionals with the skills necessary to navigate an ever-changing healthcare landscape independently. By embracing heutagogical principles, CME programs can empower learners to become lifelong, self-directed learners.²⁴ ²⁵
Pillar No. 7: Metric Matters
It is important to consider needs assessment and outcomes evaluation as parts of a continuum.²⁶ On one side of the continuum, the needs assessment explores the specific requirements and challenges faced by learners while laying the groundwork for tailored educational interventions. CE programs can only design targeted initiatives that address knowledge gaps, enhance skills and, ultimately, improve patient outcomes if they truly understand the unique learning needs of healthcare professionals.²⁷ ²⁸ ²⁹ On the other side of the continuum is the outcomes evaluation. This tool measures how learners' behavior and practices have evolved due to their educational engagement. This critical step allows educators to assess the impact of CE activities to ensure future initiatives deliver tangible benefits to both learners and patients.³⁰22 In comparison to other pillars, needs assessment and outcomes evaluation could be considered the anchor of CE. They play an indispensable role in shaping the trajectory of CE while guiding the development of impactful educational interventions and providing evidence of their efficacy within the healthcare landscape.
Recap
Each pillar plays a pivotal role in shaping the trajectory of professional growth and patient care in CE. From emphasizing evidence-based learning to promoting collaboration and leveraging technology, CE programs strive to cultivate a culture of lifelong learning among healthcare professionals. However, among these pillars, needs assessment and outcomes evaluation emerge as the keystones. They hold together the structure of tailored interventions and measure the tangible impact of CE activities. Together, they underscore the commitment to evidence-based practice and continuous improvement that ensures that CE initiatives deliver meaningful benefits to both learners and patients.
Milini Mingo, MPA, CHCP, brings years of experience in CE, with a focus on adult learning, program development and accreditation. Her insights aim to guide newcomers in navigating the complexities and opportunities of the CE profession.
² Abrahamson S, Baron J, Elstein AS, Hammond WP, Holzman GB, Marlow B, Taggart MS, Schulkin J. Continuing medical education for life: eight principles. Acad Med. 1999 Dec;74(12):1288-94. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199912000-00008. PMID: 10619003.
³ Straus, S. E., Veroniki, A. A., Pattani, R., Haynes, R. B., Richardson, W. S., & Glasziou, P. (2018). Evidence based medicine: How to practice and teach it. Elsevier Health Sciences.
⁴ Gagliardi JP, Stinnett SS, Schardt C. Innovation in evidence-based medicine education and assessment: an interactive class for third- and fourth-year medical students. J Med Libr Assoc. 2012 Oct;100(4):306-9. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.100.4.014. PMID: 23133332; PMCID: PMC3484962.
⁵ Lehane E, Leahy-Warren P, O’Riordan C, et al. Evidence-based practice education for healthcare professions: an expert viewBMJ Evidence-Based Medicine 2019;24:103-108.
⁶ Chandran, V. P., Balakrishnan, A., Rashid, M., Khan, S., Devi, E. S., Kulyadi, G. P., Nair, S., & Thunga, G. (2023). Teaching and learning strategies of evidence based medicine: A meta-synthesis of learners and instructors perspective. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health, 21, Article 101280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2023.101280
⁷ Bala MM, Poklepović Peričić T, Zajac J, Rohwer A, Klugarova J, Välimäki M, et al. (2021) What are the effects of teaching Evidence-Based Health Care (EBHC) at different levels of health professions education? An updated overview of systematic reviews. PLoS ONE 16(7): e0254191. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254191
⁸ Tenny S, Varacallo M. Evidence Based Medicine. [Updated 2022 Oct 24]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470182/
⁹ Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. 1996. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Feb;455:3-5. PMID: 17340682.
¹⁰ Guyatt, G. H., & Rennie, D. (1993). Users' guides to the medical literature. Jama, 270(17), 2096-2097.
¹¹ Kumah EA, McSherry R, Bettany-Saltikov J, Hamilton S, Hogg J, Whittaker V, van Schaik P. PROTOCOL: Evidence-informed practice versus evidence-based practice educational interventions for improving knowledge, attitudes, understanding, and behavior toward the application of evidence into practice: A comprehensive systematic review of undergraduate students. Campbell Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 23;15(1-2):e1015. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1015. PMID: 37131476; PMCID: PMC8356512.
¹² Filipe, Helena & Mack, Heather & Golnik, Karl. (2017). Continuing professional development: progress beyond continuing medical education. Annals of Ophthalmology. Annals of Eye Science 2017 , 2: 45 ( 04 July 2017 ). 45. 10.21037/aes.2017.04.01.
¹³ Balmer JT. The transformation of continuing medical education (CME) in the United States. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2013 Sep 19;4:171-82. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S35087. PMID: 24101887; PMCID: PMC3791543.
¹⁴ Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm : A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
¹⁵ Kuipers, S.J., Cramm, J.M. & Nieboer, A.P. The importance of patient-centered care and co-creation of care for satisfaction with care and physical and social well-being of patients with multi-morbidity in the primary care setting. BMC Health Serv Res 19, 13 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3818-y
¹⁶ Epstein RM, Street RL Jr. The values and value of patient-centered care. Ann Fam Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;9(2):100-3. doi: 10.1370/afm.1239. PMID: 21403134; PMCID: PMC3056855.
¹⁷ World Health Organization. (2010). Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Geneva: WHO.
¹⁸ Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education. 2022. ACCME Data Report: Renewal and Growth in Accredited Continuing Education – 2022. https://www.accme.org/data-reports
¹⁹ Knowles, M. S., Holton III, E. F., Swanson, R. A., & Robinson, P. A. (2015). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (9th ed.). Routledge.
²⁰ Palis AG, Quiros PA. Adult learning principles and presentation pearls. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr-Jun;21(2):114-22. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.129748. PMID: 24791101; PMCID: PMC4005174.
²¹ Spencer JA, Jordan RK. Learner centred approaches in medical education. BMJ. 1999 May 8;318(7193):1280-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7193.1280. PMID: 10231266; PMCID: PMC1115656.
²² Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1076
²³ Chacko, Thomas V.. Emerging Pedagogies for Effective Adult Learning: From Andragogy to Heutagogy. Archives of Medicine and Health Sciences 6(2):p 278-283, Jul–Dec 2018. | DOI: 10.4103/amhs.amhs_141_18
²⁴Hiramanek N. Self directed learning and continuing medical education. Aust Fam Physician. 2005 Oct;34(10):879-80. PMID: 16217577.
²⁵ Mamary E, Charles P. Promoting self-directed learning for continuing medical education. Med Teach. 2003 Mar;25(2):188-90. doi: 10.1080/0142159031000092607. PMID: 12745529.
²⁶ Moore DE Jr, Green JS, Gallis HA. Achieving desired results and improved outcomes: integrating planning and assessment throughout learning activities. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009 Winter;29(1):1-15. doi: 10.1002/chp.20001. PMID: 19288562.
²⁷ Grant J. Learning needs assessment: assessing the need. BMJ. 2002 Jan 19;324(7330):156-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7330.156. PMID: 11799035; PMCID: PMC64520.
²⁸Laxdal OE. Needs assessment in continuing medical education: a practical guide. J Med Educ. 1982 Nov;57(11):827-34. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198211000-00002. PMID: 6752412.
²⁹ Shannon S. Needs assessment for CME. Lancet. 2003 Mar 15;361(9361):974. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12765-1. PMID: 12649005.
³⁰ Crespo García, Raquel & Najjar, Jad & Derntl, Michael & Leony, Derick & Neumann, Susanne & Oberhuemer, Petra & Totschnig, Michael & Simon, Bernd & Gutiérrez Rojas, Israel & Delgado-Kloos, Carlos. (2010). Aligning assessment with learning outcomes in outcome-based education. IEEE EDUCON Education Engineering. 2012. 1239 - 1246. 10.1109/EDUCON.2010.5492385.