In today's rapidly evolving healthcare landscape, continuing education (CE) for health professionals faces numerous challenges. From outdated delivery methods and disconnection from actual practice needs, many CE programs struggle to engage learners meaningfully or produce lasting practice change. Enter Steven Little's concept of the "Milkshake Moment" — a powerful framework for identifying critical touchpoints where organizations can either build loyalty or damage relationships with those they serve¹.

The term originates from Little's experience at a hotel where, despite having a detailed service manual, staff refused to make him a milkshake because it was not on the menu — prioritizing rigid systems over customer satisfaction. This scenario plays out repeatedly in healthcare continuing education, where administrative convenience often supersedes learner needs and educational effectiveness.

This article explores how identifying and leveraging "Milkshake Moments" can transform healthcare continuing education from a checkbox exercise into a catalyst for meaningful professional development and organizational change. By recognizing where our systems and policies create frustration rather than value, we can revolutionize how health professionals engage with lifelong learning.

Understanding the Milkshake Moment in Healthcare Education

At its core, a "Milkshake Moment" represents any situation where organizational systems, policies or management approaches prevent delivering what customers — or in our case, learners — genuinely want and need. It is the gap between what an organization thinks it is providing and what its audience actually desires. In healthcare continuing education, these moments are particularly consequential because they affect not only learner satisfaction but potentially patient outcomes. When CE programs fail to meet the authentic needs of health professionals, the ripple effects extend beyond individual frustration to impact clinical practice quality.

Common Milkshake Moments¹ in healthcare continuing education include:

• One-size-fits-all program structures that fail to account for different learning preferences, experience levels or clinical specializations.
• Utilizing passive learning formats when practitioners need active skill development.
• Creating barriers to accessing education through complicated registration processes or inflexible scheduling.
• Focusing evaluation solely on satisfaction metrics rather than practice change.
• Divorcing educational content from the realities of clinical workflow and implementation challenges.

These moments matter because healthcare professionals already face extraordinary demands on their time and cognitive capacity. Every frustrating educational experience compounds existing burnout and disillusionment while missing opportunities to support meaningful professional growth.

Identifying Milkshake Moments in Healthcare Continuing Education

To transform continuing education, leaders must first identify where their systems are creating Milkshake Moments. This requires looking beyond traditional metrics and engaging directly with learners' experiences.

Common Pain Points for Healthcare Professionals

Through systematic assessment, certain consistent pain points emerge:

1. Accessibility barriers: Time constraints, geographic limitations and technological hurdles that prevent engagement with educational offerings.²
2. Relevance gaps: Content that fails to address real-world challenges or specific practice contexts.³
3. Format frustrations: Delivery methods that don't align with adult learning principles.⁴
4. Integration challenges: Difficulty applying new knowledge or skills within existing workflows and organizational constraints.⁵
5. Assessment misalignment: Evaluation methods that evaluate memorization rather than critical thinking or practical application.

Gathering Effective Feedback

Traditional evaluation forms rarely capture Milkshake Moments. More effective approaches include:

• Journey mapping: Tracing the learner's experience from initial awareness through application in practice.⁶
• Critical incident interviews: Asking about particularly frustrating or surprisingly positive educational experiences.⁷
• Observation studies: Witnessing firsthand how professionals interact with educational offerings.⁸
• Abandonment analysis: Investigating why learners drop out of programs or fail to complete requirements.⁹
• Implementation barriers assessment: Systematically identifying what prevents application of learning.¹⁰

Key Indicators of Milkshake Moments

Watch for these signals that you've uncovered a Milkshake Moment¹:

• Workarounds: When learners develop unofficial alternatives to bypass official processes.
• Recurring complaints: Issues mentioned consistently across different cohorts.
• Emotional language: Strong reactions when discussing certain aspects of programming.
• Participation drop-offs: Points in the educational journey where engagement declines.
• "This is just how it works" justifications: Areas where staff defend problematic processes as inevitable.

Transforming Systems Through Milkshake Moments

Once identified, Milkshake Moments offer powerful opportunities for transformation. The goal is not simply to eliminate frustration but to convert these touchpoints into opportunities for exceptional experiences.

Steps to Address Identified Moments of Frustration¹

1. Prioritize moments with the highest impact: Focus first on issues affecting the most learners or creating the greatest barriers to learning transfer.
2. Challenge underlying assumptions: Question why systems and policies exist in their current form.
3. Re-center on learner needs: Reframe problems from the healthcare professional's perspective.
4. Prototype rapid solutions: Develop quick experiments to assess alternative approaches.
5. Measure meaningful outcomes: Track not just satisfaction but changes in behavior and practice. When learners resist outcome tracking, consider embedding measurement into existing workflows, using brief pulse surveys rather than lengthy follow ups, offering incentives for participation, or partnering with organizational leaders to demonstrate value and secure buy in.

Managing Compliance-driven Milkshake Moments

While mandatory compliance requirements cannot be eliminated, the Milkshake Moment approach can transform how they are experienced. Key strategies include reframing requirements by connecting them to patient safety through real-world scenarios; optimizing delivery through microlearning and scenario-based formats; minimizing administrative burden with automated tracking and mobile-friendly access; and creating choice within constraints by offering multiple format options and flexible scheduling. Sometimes simply acknowledging that requirements may feel burdensome while explaining their necessity can reduce resistance and build trust.

Empowering Staff to Make Learner-focused Decisions

Creating lasting change requires empowering education staff to prioritize learner needs. This includes ¹:

• Decision-making authority: Giving front-line staff latitude to adapt to learner needs.
• Guiding principles vs. rigid policies: Establishing clear values that inform judgment rather than prescriptive rules.
• Recognition systems: Rewarding staff who effectively address learner challenges.
• Psychological safety: Creating environments where staff can acknowledge problems and suggest improvements without fear.
• Cross-functional collaboration: Breaking down silos between content development, technology and administration.

Creating Systems That Prioritize Learner Needs

Beyond individual moments, organizations must build systems designed around learner success:

• Personalization pathways: Allowing customization of content based on practice setting, experience level and learning goals.
• Workflow integration: Embedding educational opportunities within clinical workflows rather than separating them.
• Barrier removal: Systematically eliminating unnecessary steps, requirements and complications.
• Technology alignment: Ensuring digital tools enhance rather than complicate the learning experience.
• Continuous improvement mechanisms: Building feedback loops that drive ongoing refinement.

Implementation Framework

Step-by-Step Guide for Healthcare Education Leaders¹

Note: The following examples represent composite scenarios and potential applications based on documented organizational challenges and theoretical frameworks. While these illustrate how the Milkshake Moment concept could be applied to healthcare continuing education, they are not based on specific implemented programs. The application of business theory frameworks like Little's Milkshake Moment to healthcare continuing education represents an emerging area of practice that warrants further development and empirical validation.

1. Assessment Phase (1–2 months)

• Conduct journey mapping with diverse stakeholders.
• Analyze existing feedback and participation data.
• Perform targeted interviews about pain points.
• Observe learners interacting with current systems.

2. Prioritization Phase (2–4 weeks)

• Catalog identified Milkshake Moments.
• Rate each on impact and feasibility of change.
• Select 1–3 initial moments for transformation.
• Form cross-functional teams for each focus area.

3. Design Phase (1–3 months)

• Challenge underlying assumptions of current approaches.
• Co-create potential solutions with end users.
• Develop minimum viable changes to test.
• Establish clear success metrics aligned with learning outcomes.

4. Implementation Phase (varies by complexity)

• Pilot changes with limited scope.
• Gather rapid feedback and iterate.
• Document emerging best practices.
• Prepare communication strategy for broader rollout.

5. Scaling Phase (ongoing)

• Systematically expand successful approaches.
• Build organizational capabilities for continuous improvement.
• Share outcomes with stakeholders and leadership.
• Identify next priority Milkshake Moments.

Tools for Ongoing Evaluation and Improvement

• Learner advisory councils: Regular convenings of healthcare professionals to provide feedback on educational experiences.
• Real-time feedback mechanisms: Simple, in-the-moment ways for learners to flag frustrations or highlight successes.
• Learning application metrics: Structured follow-up to assess how education translates to practice change.
• System friction audits: Regular assessment of time, clicks and steps required for common processes.
• Competitive benchmarking: Comparison with other organizations to identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Change Management Strategies for Healthcare Education Organizations

• Compelling narrative: Crafting a clear story connecting educational transformation to enhanced patient care.
• Leadership modeling: Ensuring leaders demonstrate commitment to learner-centered approaches.
• Early wins: Identifying quick successes to build momentum and demonstrate value.
• Capability building: Developing staff skills in design thinking and learner experience.
• Reinforcement mechanisms: Aligning recognition and reward systems with learner-centered values.

Conclusion

The "Milkshake Moment" concept offers healthcare continuing education a powerful lens for transformation. By identifying where our systems create frustration rather than value, we can redesign educational experiences to genuinely support health professionals in their pursuit of excellence. Organizations that successfully address their Milkshake Moments gain significant competitive advantages: greater learner loyalty, enhanced reputation, improved operational efficiency and, most importantly, stronger impact on clinical practice. In a landscape where healthcare professionals face increasing demands and burnout, creating educational experiences that respect their time, address their needs, and support their growth is not just good business — it is essential to fulfilling our mission.

The journey begins with a simple but powerful question: Where are our systems saying "no" when we should be finding ways to say "yes" to what learners truly need? By honestly confronting these moments and committing to learner-centered transformation, we can revolutionize continuing education in the health professions. The ultimate beneficiaries will be not only the healthcare professionals we serve but the patients who depend on their knowledge, skills and engagement. In this way, addressing Milkshake Moments becomes more than an operational improvement — it becomes a contribution to healthcare quality and safety across the system.

References

1. Little SS. The milkshake moment : overcoming stupid systems, pointless policies, and muddled management to realize real growth. John Wiley & Sons; 2008:x, 195 p.
2. Mahdavi Ardestani SF, Adibi S, Golshan A, Sadeghian P. Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of E-Learning in Healthcare: A Fuzzy ANP Study. Healthcare (Basel). Jul 16 2023;11(14)doi:10.3390/healthcare11142035
3. DeSilets LD. The Institute of Medicine's Redesigning Continuing Education in the Health Professions. J Contin Educ Nurs. Aug 2010;41(8):340–1. doi:10.3928/00220124-20100726-02
4. Ressler K. 5 Trends Transforming the Continuing Education Landscape. May 19, 2025. https://info.nhanow.com/learning-leading-blog/5-trends-transforming-the-continuing-education-landscape
5. Philips. Addressing the need for continuing education in healthcare. https://www.usa.philips.com/healthcare/article/continuing-education-for-healthcare-professionals
6. Davies EL, Bulto LN, Walsh A, et al. Reporting and conducting patient journey mapping research in healthcare: A scoping review. J Adv Nurs. Jan 2023;79(1):83–100. doi:10.1111/jan.15479
7. Schluter J, Seaton P, Chaboyer W. Critical incident technique: a user's guide for nurse researchers. J Adv Nurs. Jan 2008;61(1):107–114. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04490.x
8. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. Oct 20 2007;370(9596):1453–7. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X
9. Powell KR, Farmer M, Liu J, Alexander GL. A Survey of Technology Abandonment in US Nursing Homes. J Am Med Dir Assoc. Jan 2024;25(1):6–11. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2023.09.002
10. Stoffman JM. Overcoming the barriers to implementation of competence-based medical education in post-graduate medical education: a narrative literature review. Med Educ Online. Dec 2022;27(1):2112012. doi:10.1080/10872981.2022.2112012